Have you noticed that politicians in general, and several in particular, are getting a whole lot more careful about their weight ?
The former governor of Arkansas, Mike Huckabee, unloaded a whole lot of weight, and even campaigns for president on the idea that his single-mindedness on this issue presages an ability to concentrate on what’s really important for the country.
Panting for Power?
Bill Clinton took flak for years about jogging– to Micky D’s. And then there’s Al Gore, who is said not to be planning to run next year because he’s let his weight go up again. Barack Obama is seen on the beach, and his pretty well-developed pecs noted. Governor Richardson is running, but deemed not quite ready for prime time because he’s packing a few too many pounds. A lot of people think Newt Gingrich’s face is too round for a president. Even Hillary, rumor has it, covers up legs that are not as shapely as she might like with those pantsuits. And Dennis Hastert probably lost his position as much because of being super-sized as anything else.
So, what does this mean ? The American people seem to have become down-right tolerant of plus-size people– as long as they aren’t major politicians. No more Wm. Howard Tafts ( http://www.doctorzebra.com/prez/z_x27fat_g.htm ) on the horizon, EVER.
It’s all about body image and self-esteem, isn’t it ? But does that mean we’re shallow ? No, I don’t think so. Perhaps inately we know that people who are to have weighty responsibilities need to have better health to withstand their stresses. We here also understand that the “heroin chic” or “Twiggy” looks of yesteryear are simply unhealthy. No bulemics or anorexics need apply. [Read More . . .] Continue reading →